iSide by side
The approaches, compared
The ATO describes three internationally defined approaches. business.gov.au, writing for owners, lists five common methods. They map onto each other like this.
| Approach | The question it asks | business.gov.au’s matching methods | Where it gets hard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market | What have comparable assets actually sold for, or been offered at? | Current market values. | The ATO lists poorly chosen comparables among the issues it commonly sees. |
| Income | What income or cash flows can the business be expected to generate? | Return on investment; future profit. | Assumptions. The ATO flags unsupported adjustments to discount rates and capitalisation multiples, and proxies based on historical performance. |
| Cost | What would it cost to replicate, in similar condition, at the valuation date? | Business asset value; cost of starting from scratch. | Intangibles. Goodwill is hard to calculate and gives different results by method. |
Inside each approach sit particular methods. For the income approach, the ATO names the discounted cash flow method and the capitalisation of earnings method, and says the valuer must choose the most appropriate method for the asset.